Skip to main content

 

Returning to Performing as Adult Advanced Pianist –
Part 1 – Addressing Tension and Technical Issues

I think we all can agree that as a piano teacher that the benefit of maintaining a practicing and performing routine is immeasurable. But juggling this with long hours of teaching, family life, and other adult commitments is by no means easy. But sadly, and understandably, the number of teachers and adults who no longer practice and perform far outnumber those who do. If you would like to take that first step to start performing again, read on.

I’m sure you were at one point of your younger life were a competent performer; any teachers who had studied for formal music qualifications had to be. You might even at one point be performing fiendishly difficult pieces like Liszt’s Transcendental Etudes or even piano concertos. You decided to start practicing again, resuming from the point where you stopped. And it soon dawned upon you that you could not move as agile as you used to, but then you chalked it up to just being ‘rusty’. You decided to start practicing more, and you began to experience ache or worse, pain.

Sounds familiar?
Yes, unfortunately this anecdote is not uncommon. Less than ideal technique might not rear its ugly head when we were younger. But like it or not, our body is less flexible and heals damages slower when we are older. We can no longer get away with limited understanding of piano technique at more advanced age. I will now share some issues I encountered myself and offer starting points to help tackle them.

1.     Diagnose and correct technical issues.

Even big-name pianists like Gary Graffman, Leon Fleisher, and most recently, Lang Lang suffered from debilitating injuries that put their careers on hold. And these injuries could have been preventable had they worked on their technical issues when they were younger instead of just brute forcing their way through virtuosic repertoire. While this might be an over-simplification, from my experience most of the time technical issues that adult pianists face can be traced to technique that relies heavily on finger action with little utilization of entire arm mechanism. This results in high build-up of unreleased tension that would cripple playing and cause gradual damage to the hands and arms.

Sadly, not many of us were fortunate enough to have a teacher who adopts a more holistic approach towards technique. But it is never too late to fix this; even Lang Lang had to do this in his 30s. While it is possible to certain extent to self-diagnose and correct your issues, it might be a good idea to source a teacher or mentor who could walk you through the corrective process. Though teachers who are trained in Taubman Approach or Alexander Technique are usually recommended for this purpose, any other teachers with holistic technique would be equally qualified too.

2.     Learn adaptive strategies for small hands.

Another common issue limiting adult returners especially ladies are lack of understanding of strategies to tackle difficult passages that are not suited for small hands. Stretching our fingers to reach those big chords or intervals always cause tension, but the difference is with an aging body the tension threshold is lower and this strategy might no longer be viable. I remembered having no issue with stretching my fingers to handle for example the wide left-hand broken chords of Chopin’s Fantasie Impromptu when I was younger, but now they are exponentially more difficult to play.

Pretty much all my ex-teachers had large-sized hands; they were often clueless on how to help me when I struggled with my small hands though they had excellent technical knowledge. Thankfully, more studies had been done recently on this issue and small-handed pianists no longer must resign themselves to avoid playing problematic pieces. The excellent book “Adaptive Strategies for Small-handed Pianists” is a good starting point to learn strategies for small-handed pianists. It is perfectly fine not to be slavish to the printed score and accept that you would probably need to make some modifications such as rearranging or omitting notes.

3.     Dial back the difficulty of the repertoire.

If you realise that you are struggling with at least one issue I have raised above, then it is prudent to dial back the difficulty of your repertoire first. Or even avoid repertoire that cause you teething technical issues. I understand it might feel demoralizing to not be able to immediately play advanced repertoire like you used to. But look at the silver lining, there are plenty of attractive repertoire beyond the usual warhorses. You could also choose easier pieces that help you address technical issues you have. Then gradually increase the difficulty until you are back at same point where you used to.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

My Student Did Not Practice Again

My Student Did Not Practice Again I am sure the sight of a student who did not practice again was not unfamiliar to many of us teachers. I understand that it is frustrating and could suck the joy of teaching; I do know teachers who threw in the towel because of this. I must admit that it was a sore point at one point of my teaching career, but I decided to adopt a more positive approach because I genuinely wanted all my students to have a positive learning experience. Let me share with you a couple of pointers that hopefully could provide you with better solutions to this issue. ·       Empathize and diagnose It might be an instinct for many of us to immediately ask “Why didn’t you practice?” in a disapproving tone when faced with a non-practicing student. We might even launch into a tirade chiding student or institute a penalty. Perhaps naively we think that the student would feel bad for disappointing us. But trust me on this, those actions are going to have opposite the effects

Assigning Repertoire - The Balanced Approach

Assigning Repertoire - The Balanced Approach For the inaugural post of this blog, I am going to write about a topic that I feel is integral in piano teaching but strangely rarely discussed even in many pedagogical literatures. When it comes to choosing and repertoire for students, teachers often do this in linear fashion. Meaning, the next pieces a student learn would be incrementally more difficult than the current ones. So, for example, once a Grade 4 student completed Grade 4, they would move on the Grade 5 and only work on pieces set for Grade 5. Many teachers I know of follow this system, and to them it seems to be logical and fuss-free. But is it really? Consider that assigning repertoire this way means students would most likely be working only on pieces that are challenging for them. Motivated students might relish the challenge, but for majority of average students this might mean increasingly slow and frustrating progress that would gradually erode motivation. In addi